VMenu

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.
Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Cars & Transportation: Aircraft: “Question: Can an aircraft reaching mach 2 on an afterburning (wet) 120kn turbojet do the same with a non afterburning (dry) 120kn turbofan?” plus 5 more

Cars & Transportation: Aircraft: “Question: Can an aircraft reaching mach 2 on an afterburning (wet) 120kn turbojet do the same with a non afterburning (dry) 120kn turbofan?” plus 5 more


Question: Can an aircraft reaching mach 2 on an afterburning (wet) 120kn turbojet do the same with a non afterburning (dry) 120kn turbofan?

Posted: 08 Sep 2015 12:46 AM PDT

No - the flow velocity of a turbofan is too low. A jet plane can not fly faster than the rearward velocity of the gases leaving it's engine.

It's back to Newton's laws of motion Force=mass x acceleration. The two engines produce that 120kn using different approaches. For a turbo fan, the mass is much larger, so the acceleration can be lower. If you are feeding 4 times the mass of air through the engine, you only have 1/4 the acceleration.

The rated thrust of a jet engine is it's STATIC thrust, the faster the plane flies the lower the actual thrust it can produce. Let say that flow leaves the turbofan at 300m/s (a little more that 1000km/h) When the engine is stationary, all of the air entering the engine is accelerated from 0 m/s to 300 ms. If the plane is moving forward at 200 m/s, that flow starts with a realative velocity of 200/ms, and is accelerate to 300 m/s - a net acceleration of 100 m/s. With only a third of the acceleration, you only get a third of the thrust.

To fly at mach 2, the engine exhaust must be leaving the engine at a speed greater than mach 2 (that's why there are often shock patterns in flow out of an afterburning engine) , and no turbofan creates velocities that high

Question: West coast bases USA ATC how busy are they all, Washington California Idaho Nevada?

Posted: 07 Sep 2015 10:07 PM PDT

Report Abuse

Additional Details